Program Policy | THE TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR TEACHER EDUCATION

PROGRAM POLICIES

The materials found on this website are copyrighted © and trademarked ™ as the property of The Texas Institute for Teacher Education and may not be reproduced without the express written permission of The Texas Institute for Teacher Education.

PRIVACY STATEMENT

The Texas Institute for Teacher Education web site will not require the use of cookie files or cookies to view public information. A cookie file is an electronic record containing unique information a web site can use to track such things as passwords; lists of pages visited; and the date when a specific page was accessed; or to identify a user session at a particular web site. A cookie is often used in commercial sites to identify the items selected for a specific shopping cart or web portal. The Texas Institute for Teacher Education website may require the use of cookies to facilitate applications that display user-specific web pages. Information gathered using cookies will only be used by The Texas Institute for Teacher Education web site to facilitate the display of information to the web user.

If you send us an electronic mail message with a question or comment that contains personally identifying information or fill out a form that transmits this information to us, we will only use the personally identifiable information to respond to your request and analyze trends. We may redirect the text of your message to another government agency or person who is in a better position to answer your question. While doing this, however, we are bound by procedure to withhold your identifying personal information from the forwarded email.

We may direct you to personally contact another agency or person.

For site management functions, information is collected for analysis and statistical purposes. This information is not reported or used in any manner that would reveal personally identifiable information. We use log analysis tools to create summary statistics, which are used for purposes such as assessing what information is of most interest, determining technical design specifications, and identifying system performance or problem areas.

HYPERLINKS

Any links outside The Texas Institute for Teacher Education web site are provided as a convenience to our viewers. The Texas Institute For Teacher Education has no control over the content of these linked sites. The Texas Institute for Teacher Education does not necessarily endorse any products or services sold by any of these linked sites. The Texas Institute for Teacher Education will link to sites only if they are determined to be aligned with the Institute's own goals and positions. If you discover an error on one of the sites, contact the webmaster of that linked site.

DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Any dispute or disagreement between us of any kind, if it cannot be resolved by negotiation, shall be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the then current rules of the American Arbitration Association. A single arbitrator engaged in the practice of law shall conduct the arbitration, whose decision and award shall be final and binding and may be entered in any court with jurisdiction.

Stakeholder complaints must be filed in accordance with this complaint policy, except as required by the policies listed below.

Use the ELECTRONIC COMPLAINT FORM to submit your complaint. Some of these policies may require appeals to be submitted in accordance with the complaint policy:

Complaints alleging discrimination or harassment based on race, color, gender, national origin, disability, or religion.
Complaints concerning retaliation related to discrimination and harassment.
Complaints concerning identification, evaluation, or educational placement of a candidate with a disability within the scope of Section 504 or ADA.

Informal Process:

The Program encourages stakeholders to discuss their concerns with the Academic Director who has the authority to address the concerns. Concerns should be expressed as soon as possible to allow early resolution at the lowest possible level. Informal resolution shall be encouraged but shall not extend any deadlines, except by mutual written consent.

Formal Process:

A stakeholder may initiate the formal process described below by timely filing a written complaint form. Even after initiating the formal complaint process, stakeholders are encouraged to seek informal resolution of their concerns. A stakeholder whose concerns are resolved may withdraw a formal complaint at any time.

The process described in this complaint policy shall not be construed to create new or additional rights beyond those granted by law or program policy, nor to require a full evidentiary hearing or “mini-trial” at any level.

Filing:

Complaint forms and appeal notices may be filed by hand-delivery, by electronic communication, including e-mail and fax, or by U.S. Mail. Hand-delivered filings shall be timely filed if received by the Academic Director by the close of business on the deadline date. Filings submitted by electronic communication shall be timely filed if they are received by the close of business on the deadline date, as indicated by the date and time shown on the electronic communication. Mail filings shall be timely filed if they are post-marked by U.S. Mail on or before the deadline and received by the Academic Director no more than three days after the deadline date.

Scheduling Conferences:

The Academic Director will make reasonable attempts to schedule conferences at a mutually agreeable time. If a stakeholder fails to appear at a scheduled conference, the Academic Director may hold the conference and issue a decision in the stakeholder’s absence.

Response:

At Levels One and Two, “response” shall mean a written communication to the stakeholder from the appropriate Academic Director. Responses may be hand-delivered, sent by electronic communication to the stakeholder’s e-mail address of record, or sent by U.S. Mail to the stakeholder’s mailing address of record. Mailed responses shall be timely if they are postmarked by U.S. Mail on or before 3 days of the conference.

Days:

“Days” shall mean business days. In calculating time lines, the day a document is filed is “day zero.” The following business day is “day one.”

Representative:

“Representative” shall mean any person who or organization that is designated by the stakeholder to represent the stakeholder in the complaint process.

The stakeholder may designate a representative through written notice to the Academic Director at any level of this process. If the stakeholder designates a representative with fewer than three days’ notice to the Academic Director before a scheduled conference or hearing, the Academic Director may reschedule the conference or hearing to a later date, if desired. The Program may be represented by counsel at any level of the process.

Untimely Filings:

All time limits shall be strictly followed unless modified by mutual written consent.

If a complaint form or appeal notice is not timely filed, the complaint may be dismissed, on written notice to the stakeholder, at any point during the complaint process. The stakeholder may appeal the dismissal by seeking review in writing within ten days from the date of the written dismissal notice, starting at the level at which the complaint was dismissed. Such appeal shall be limited to the issue of timeliness.

Costs Incurred:

Each party shall pay its own costs incurred during the complaint.

Complaint and Appeal Forms:

Complaints and appeals under the complaint policy shall be submitted to the EPP.

Copies of any documents that support the complaint should be attached to the complaint form. If the stakeholder does not have copies of these documents, copies may be presented at the Level One conference. After the Level One conference, no new documents may be submitted unless the stakeholder did not know the documents existed before the Level One conference. A complaint or appeal form that is incomplete in any material aspect may be dismissed but may be refiled with all the required information if the refiling is within the designated time for filing.

Level 1:

Complaint forms must be filed:

Within 15 days of the date the stakeholder first knew, or with reasonable diligence should have known, of the decision or action giving rise to the complaint or grievance: and
With the Academic Director who has the authority to remedy the alleged problem.

The Academic Director shall investigate as necessary and schedule a conference with the stakeholder within ten days after receipt of the written complaint. The Academic Director may set time limits for the conference.

Absent extenuating circumstances, the Academic Director shall provide the stakeholder a written response within ten days following the conference. In reaching a decision, the Academic Director may consider information provided at the Level One conference and any other relevant documents or information the Academic Director believes will help resolve the complaint.

Level 2:

If the stakeholder did not receive the relief requested at Level One or if the time for a response has expired, the stakeholder may request a conference with the EPP Advisory Board to appeal the Level One decision.

The appeal notice must be filed in writing, on a form provided by the Program, within ten days of the date of the written Level One response or, if no response was received, within ten days of the deadline.

After receiving notice of the appeal, the Academic Director shall prepare and forward a record of the Level One complaint to the EPP Advisory Board or designee.

The Level One record shall include:

The original complaint form and any attachments.
All other documents submitted by the stakeholder at Level One.
The written response issued at Level One and any attachments.
All other documents relied upon by the Academic Director in reaching the Level One decision.

The EPP Advisory Board or designee shall schedule a conference within ten days after the appeal notice is filed. The conference shall be limited to the issues and documents considered at Level One. At the conference, the stakeholder may provide information concerning any documents or information relied upon by the Academic Director for the Level One decision. The EPP Advisory Board or designee may set reasonable time limits for the conference.

The EPP Advisory Board or designee shall provide the stakeholder a written response within ten days following the conference. In reaching a decision, the EPP Advisory Board or designee may consider the Level One record, information provided at the Level Two conference, and any other relevant documents or information the EPP Advisory Board or designee believes will help resolve the complaint.

Recordings of the Level One and Level Two conferences, if any, shall be maintained with the Level One and Level Two records.

If the stakeholder is not satisfied with the complaint process or out-come, the stakeholder may file a complaint against the Program with the Texas Education Agency. The official Texas Education Agency complaint process can be found at http://tea.texas.gov/About_TEA/Contact_Us/Complaints/Complaints/.

Consumer report information may be found at https://tea.texas.gov/Texas_Educators/Preparation_and_Continuing_Education/Consumer_Information_about_Educator_Preparation_Programs.aspx

GOVERNING LAW

The Texas Institute for Teacher Education is a United States corporation and is in the State of Texas. Our Policy shall be governed under the laws of the State of Texas, United States of America without regard to its conflicts of law provisions.

PERSONAL DATA COLLECTED

Some of the information collected from our visitors is given freely to The Texas Institute for Teacher Education via internet inquires sent to TXITE, admission applications, surveys, and telephone conversations with our representatives. This data is collected only on a voluntary basis and is at the option of the website user.

NON-PERSONALLY IDENTIFIABLE INFORMATION

TXITE utilizes “cookies” and other standard web technology to collect non-personally identifiable information from our website visitors. This data is automatically collected data includes such data as: type of web browser you use, your IP address, the operating system on your computer, the links you follow within our website, and the links you follow when entering and/or leaving our website.

USE OF INFORMATION

The personally identifiable information is only used internally to TXITE and every effort is made to ensure that it is not released outside of the TXITE to a third party without your consent. Data that you provide voluntarily such as your name, address, telephone number, and email address is collected and used by the TXITE to respond to your inquires and to provide you with information concerning future products and/or services. TXITE utilizes the non-personally identifiable information that is collected via cookies to ensure that our webpage is usable by most of its visitors. The information allows TXITE to update and modify its webpage, so it reflects the features most often requested and used by its visitors.

SECURITY OF INFORMATION

The Texas Institute for Teacher Education utilizes best efforts to protect and secure personal information that is collected through its website. All financial and application transactions that require the use of personal data are submitted through the website using the encrypted Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocol.

WEBSITE USER OPTIONS

You have several options that will allow you to opt out of providing information to The Texas Institute for Teacher Education. First, you may opt out of providing non-personal information collected using cookies by disabling or rejecting cookies for TXITE’ website. For more information on cookies, including how you can delete or reject cookies, please refer to your Web browser’s help file. Disabling or rejecting cookies may impact your user experience as they are necessary to provide you with the ability to maneuver through the website and view various data files. Regarding personal information collected through the website, you may opt out of The Texas Institute for Teacher Education’s marketing solicitations at any time by contacting us through our admission representatives or sending an email to admin@txite.today. The email should contain a statement saying that you wish to be removed from TXITE marketing solicitations and providing TXITE with the spelling of your name, your address, and your email address. You will promptly be removed from our solicitation lists.

FAMILY EDUCATION RIGHTS AND PRIVACY ACT (FERPA)

The Family Education Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) of 1974 provides, generally, that (1) teacher candidates shall have the right of access to their educational records, and (2) educational institutions shall not release educational records to non-college employees without consent of the teacher candidate. Written consent of the teacher candidate is required before The Texas Institute for Teacher Education can release information concerning the teacher candidate to prospective employers, government agencies, credit bureaus, etc. Teacher candidates and alumni applying for jobs, credit, etc., can expedite their applications by providing The Texas Institute for Teacher Education with written permission to release their records, specifying which records and to whom the release should be made. For further details on and exceptions to the policies affecting disclosure of teacher candidate records, contact the Administrative Office.

You will need to have access to your own computer and a high-speed Internet Service Provider to attend any schedule Zoom meetings. A webcam and a headset or microphone for your computer is recommended and may be required. Class and instructor meetings, if held, may meet through the Zoom online conference system. For everyone’s benefit, join the meeting in a quiet place whenever possible. Turn on your video whenever possible. Mute your microphone unless you are speaking.

Course participants must be proficient in the following:

Basic computer skills sending/receiving email sending and receiving attachments via email; using a web browser; finding resources through search engines; downloading and installing software; familiarity with using browser plug-ins (e.g., PDF reader, video, audio); using a word processing, presentation software, or other productivity applications; experience/familiarity with a variety of file formats such as: .pdf "Portable Document Format", .rtf "Rich Text Format", .doc or .docx "Microsoft Word Document", and .txt "Text document;" familiarity with using document scanners or document scanning apps to convert handwritten work to a PDF file; and the ability to be self-directed in learning new technology skills (e.g., following a handout, a step-by-step tutorial, online video help, or access to support to learn necessary skills).

Minimum Computer Requirements:

Operating System: Windows 10 or higher, or macOS 10.14 (Mojave) or higher.

Processor: Minimum: Intel Core i3 or AMD equivalent. Recommended: Intel Core i5 or higher or AMD Ryzen series.

RAM (Memory): Minimum: 4 GB. Recommended: 8 GB or higher for smoother multitasking and handling multimedia content.

Storage: Minimum: 128 GB Hard Disk Drive (HDD) or Solid State Drive (SSD). Recommended: 256 GB SSD or higher for faster performance.

Display: Minimum: 1024 x 768 resolution. Recommended: Full HD (1920 x 1080) resolution.

Internet Browser: Latest versions of Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Safari, or Microsoft Edge. Browser must support HTML5 and JavaScript.

Internet Connection: Minimum: Broadband connection with a download speed of at least 5 Mbps. Recommended: High-speed broadband connection with a download speed of 10 Mbps or higher for video streaming and video conferencing.

Additional Technology Requirements:

Software: Microsoft Office Suite (Word, Excel, PowerPoint) or equivalent software (Google Workspace, LibreOffice, etc.). PDF Reader (e.g., Adobe Acrobat Reader). Updated antivirus and anti-malware software.

Webcam and Microphone: Internal or external webcam with at least 720p resolution. Internal or external microphone; a headset with a microphone is recommended for better audio quality.

Audio: Speakers or headphones/earbuds.

Email: Access to a reliable email account; some institutions may require using a school-provided email account.

Learning Management System (LMS):

Access to the LMS (Populi) through compatible browsers and operating systems.

Proctorio:

Proctorio necessitates specific browser extensions or settings.

Statistics Tracking:

Please be advised that instructors are tracking your online activity, such as attendance and participation, to ensure your success. Our learning management system has different tools to track candidate logins, the time candidates have spent in the module, and what pages in the module they are accessing.

With Statistics Tracking, instructors can run a report to view detailed information about candidates accessing module content, including how many times an item was view and when it was accessed.

LEARNING ASSESSMENTS

Your learning is assessed within courses in a variety of ways. Examples of assessments include course discussion forums, performance-based assessments, professional reflections, formative/summative assessments, and open-response quizzes. TXITE requires proctored final examinations for each course. Videos recorded during the exam session contain full-length webcam views, audios, and desktop recordings. Videos are stored and available to TXITE administrators for review. The course syllabus will indicate any unique exam rules that may apply. Videos will be reviewed with these rules in mind and violations will be reported to TXITE administrators. Teacher candidates must have an operational webcam/video, computer, high-speed internet connection and allow the third party proctor service (if needed) to access their webcam and microphone during the proctored examination. Teacher candidates are required to identify themselves with a valid government-issued photo ID. Teacher candidates may only have one internet browser window open while taking their proctored exams unless otherwise specified. The use of internet-accessible devices, such as smartphones and tablets, are strictly prohibited during the exam. Teacher candidates may not bring removable media of any type during the proctored exam (e.g., flash drives, etc.). Teacher candidates are not allowed to converse with anyone other than their proctor during the proctored assessment. Proctors are prohibited from assisting with the exam except for procedural or administrative issues. No one, at any time, is permitted to assist the teacher candidate logging in or setting up the proctoring system. This will be flagged as a test violation. Therefore, if one is unable to operate the system, the teacher candidate should immediately contact their course instructor.

Administrative or Academic Practices: Teacher candidates are subject to identity verification using personally identifiable information provided by the teacher candidate upon application to the TXITE. Teacher candidates must provide their assigned Teacher candidate ID Number, along with other requested sources of personally identifiable information when contacting the TXITE via email or phone. In addition, faculty and staff may commence verification of teacher candidate identity following a review of teacher candidate work. Noticeable changes in academic performance and/or writing style will be monitored and an identity verification process could be initiated if unexplained changes in teacher candidate performance are detected.

MONITORING ACADEMIC ENGAGEMENT

Proctored Exams: Throughout a teacher candidate’s program of study, assessments from select graduate courses will be proctored. Proctored exams serve as an additional identity verification process used by TXITE to ensure academic integrity and meet accreditation requirements. Teacher candidates are required to complete proctored exams throughout their program as a requirement for graduation. Proctored exam information and rules are provided in each course syllabus where a proctored exam is required. Taking proctored exams is mandatory, without exception, and is not subject for appeal. Failure to complete the proctored exam could result in, but not limited to: a failing grade (F) for the course or future enrollments for that teacher candidate could be canceled until that course has been taken and the proctored exam completed.

MONITORING SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITY

Teacher candidates sharing common traits with other TXITE teacher candidates will be reviewed for suspicious activity. Common traits that will be reviewed include, but are not limited to:

Physical address

IP addresses

Telephone numbers

Personal references

Email addresses

Teacher candidates that are determined to be in violation of this policy will be immediately withdrawn from the TXITE and / or possibly reported to the appropriate authorities.

The Texas Institute for Teacher Education reserves the right to update or modify this policy and any privacy notice, at any time and without prior notice, by posting the revised version of the policy or privacy notice on this website. If TXITE modifies this policy or any privacy notice, the modifications will only apply to the personal information the TXITE collects after the new policy or privacy notice is posted to this website. Your use of this website following any change to the policy or privacy notice is posted constitutes your agreement that all information collected from or about you after the revised policy is posted will be subject to the terms of the revised policy. You may access the current version of this policy at any time by clicking on the link marked "Privacy Policy" at the bottom of each page of the public areas of this site.

ACADEMIC RECORDS

Academic records are stored primarily in digital form on secure web servers. Digital back-up copies of your records, paper documents such as your transcripts, printed copies of your digital records (when required), and your other records are maintained by TXITE. Your records include but are not limited to documents and files related to academics, admissions, advising, discipline, payment, credit, and placement. Original documents and digital files submitted to TXITE become a permanent part of your file and will not be returned to you or sent elsewhere.

TEACHER CANDIDATE IDENTIFICATION VERIFICATION

Before TXITE staff can discuss or release information about a teacher candidate over the phone, we will need to verify the teacher candidate’s identity. The teacher candidate will need to accurately confirm their address, telephone number, and email address on record. TXITE has a significant responsibility to ensure that the academic integrity of the institution is intact. We must take steps necessary to ensure that teacher candidates are academically engaged and that the teacher candidate who earns academic credit is, in fact, the person doing the work.

VERIFYING TEACHER CANDIDATE IDENTITY

All teacher candidates must submit a copy of a valid government-issued photo identification during the admissions process to the TXITE.

IDENTITY VERIFICATION METHODS

Teacher candidates enrolled in courses or programs are subject to one or more of the following teacher candidate identity verification methods: Secure, Individual Login and Passcode for LMS: Teacher candidates are provided a Username and Password for Populi LMS. These assigned identifiers are used to access the Populi LMS to view course grades and related information and to complete coursework. Upon acceptance to the TXITE, new teacher candidates will gain set up access to Populi using the email associated with the teacher candidate during the admissions process.

TRANSFERRING CREDITS TO TXITE

Teacher candidates may transfer credits successfully completed at other EPPs by submitting a Transfer Form completed by the previous EPP.

TRANSFERRING CREDITS FROM TXITE

Should a teacher candidate wish to transfer TXITE course credits to another institution or to pursue a graduate degree at another institution, it should be noted that the acceptance of TXITE’s credits is discretionary on the part of the receiving institution. TXITE is not a degree-granting institution of higher education.

INTERNATIONAL VISITORS

The Texas Institute for Teacher Education is operated and managed on servers located within the United States. If you are a citizen of the European Union or other regions of the world and choose to use request information about TXITE or become a teacher candidate, you then acknowledge that TXITE will transfer your personal data to the United States to provide you with the requested information and/or provide educational service. The only other sharing of your data will be for purposes where you provide written informed consent.

EUROPEAN UNION DATA PROTECTION

Citizens of the European Union are entitled to certain rights with respect to personal information that TXITE holds about them:

Right to object. The right to object, on grounds relating to your situation, to the processing of your personal information, and to object to processing of your personal information for direct marketing purposes, to the extent it is related to such direct marketing;

Right to data portability. The right to obtain access to your personal information, along with certain related information, and to receive that information in a commonly used format and to have it transferred to another data controller;

Right to be forgotten. The right to obtain the erasure of your personal information without undue delay in certain circumstances, such as where the personal information is no longer necessary in relation to the purposes for which it was collected or processed;

Right to ask for incorrect data to be corrected. The right to have your personal information corrected without undue delay if that personal information is inaccurate or incomplete; and

Right to restriction. The right to obtain the restriction of the processing undertaken by us on your personal information in certain circumstances, such as where the accuracy of the personal information is contested by you, for a period enabling us to verify the accuracy of that personal information. You may also have the right to make a complaint to the relevant Supervisory Authority. A list of Supervisory Authorities is available here: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/data-protection/bodies/authorities/index_en.htm.

STUDENT INTEGRITY AND ACADEMIC HONESTY POLICY

At The Texas Institute for Teacher Education (TXITE), academic integrity is fundamental to our mission of preparing future teachers. Our commitment to fostering a culture of honesty, ethical behavior, and professional responsibility ensures that every teacher candidate develops the necessary character to lead with integrity in their future classrooms. This policy serves as a framework for upholding the highest ethical standards, ensuring that all academic and professional activities within the program are conducted honestly and fairly.

Commitment to Academic Integrity

Academic integrity represents the foundation upon which our educational community is built. Teacher candidates are expected to engage in conduct that reflects honesty, responsibility, and respect for the intellectual property of others. At TXITE, maintaining academic integrity means consistently producing original work, accurately citing sources, and ensuring that assessments are a true reflection of individual effort and understanding. Violations of these principles, including acts of dishonesty such as plagiarism or cheating, will not be tolerated as they compromise the trust within the academic community and diminish the value of the education provided.

Prohibited Behaviors

Teacher candidates are expected to understand and avoid the following forms of academic dishonesty:

Plagiarism: This occurs when an individual presents someone else’s work, ideas, or words as their own without providing proper credit or citation. Plagiarism can take many forms, including copying text from a book, article, or website without acknowledgment, or paraphrasing someone else's ideas without credit. For example, if a candidate submits a research paper and copies entire paragraphs from a source without citation, this is a clear violation of academic integrity.
Cheating: Using unauthorized materials or assistance during examinations, quizzes, or assignments constitutes cheating. This could include consulting notes, accessing digital resources not permitted during a test, or receiving help from others on individual assignments. For instance, using a mobile device to search for answers during an online exam would be considered cheating.
Fabrication: The falsification or invention of data, research, or citations in academic work is strictly prohibited. Fabrication could involve altering data to fit a hypothesis or creating false references to support an argument. For example, if a teacher candidate invents data for a classroom assessment to support their lesson plan, it is a violation of academic honesty.
Collusion: Collaborating with others on assignments intended to be completed independently is a form of academic misconduct. This includes allowing someone else to contribute to your work without acknowledgment or submitting work completed by another as your own. For example, if two candidates work together on an assignment and submit nearly identical answers without authorization from the instructor, they are engaging in collusion.

Verification of Teacher Candidate Identity

TXITE takes the verification of teacher candidate identity seriously to ensure that the individual earning academic credit is the same person completing the coursework and assessments. During the admissions process, all teacher candidates are required to submit a valid government-issued photo identification. Additionally, once admitted, candidates are provided with unique login credentials to access the Learning Management System (Populi). This secure login system is used to access coursework, submit assignments, and complete exams, ensuring that all work completed is authenticated to the candidate.

TESTING PROCTORING

Proctoring plays a critical role in the development and assessment of future teachers at TXITE. The use of proctoring, especially through remote proctoring services like Proctorio, introduces an essential layer of accountability and fairness, preserving the credibility of the assessment process. Proctorio monitors exam sessions via webcams, screen recordings, and audio captures to detect and deter dishonest behaviors, such as cheating or unauthorized collaboration. This ensures that the results of the assessments genuinely reflect each candidate's efforts, knowledge, and skills, which is crucial in a profession where ethical standards are paramount.

Proctoring also serves an educational function by preparing future teachers to understand the importance of maintaining assessment integrity in their own professional lives. As educators, they will be responsible for creating fair and reliable testing environments for their students. Experiencing proctored exams firsthand gives teacher candidates insight into the need for controlled environments where students can demonstrate their abilities without external assistance or unfair advantages.

Exam Preparation and Guidelines

As you prepare for your upcoming exam proctored by Proctorio, we encourage you to approach this time with integrity and faith. Please review and adhere to the following guidelines to ensure a smooth and honorable testing experience:

Maintain Focus: Keep your gaze centered on the screen throughout the exam. Trust in your preparation and avoid looking down or away, as this may trigger alerts and affect the integrity of the exam.
Hand Visibility: Keep your hands visible on the desk or table during the entire exam. This practice reflects honesty and ensures that no unauthorized materials or actions are being used.
Minimize Distractions: Do not engage in any activities unrelated to the exam, such as answering phone calls or responding to messages. Seek a quiet and undisturbed space to honor the commitment of this exam time. Do not leave the examination area.
Clear Background: Ensure that your exam environment has a clear and uncluttered background. A tidy space reflects clarity of purpose and helps Proctorio’s system monitor the testing area effectively.
Exam Environment: Choose a peaceful, well-lit location for taking the exam, free from interruptions and distractions. Let those around you know of your exam time to prevent disturbances, creating a respectful and focused atmosphere. The presence of others within the examination space will nullify exam results. Do not have any technological devices present within the examination space. The recording or filming of the examination in any way will result in immediate program dismissal without the possibility of appeal.
Technical and Identity Checks: Confirm that your computer meets the necessary system requirements and that Proctorio is properly installed. Have a valid photo ID ready for identity verification at the start of the exam.
Instructor Oversight: Please be aware that instructors will review all exam sessions and any flagged incidents. Actions inconsistent with academic integrity will be reported to the program director for appropriate action, including immediate program dismissal.
Seek Guidance if Needed: If you encounter any technical difficulties, seek support from Proctorio’s troubleshooting resources or contact their support team for assistance.

Remember, challenges are opportunities to seek help and persevere. Approach your exam with faith, diligence, and honesty. May your efforts be blessed with clarity and success.

Consequences for Violations of Academic Integrity

TXITE enforces strict consequences for violations of academic integrity to maintain the trust and credibility of its educational programs. Teacher candidates who engage in academic dishonesty may face the following penalties:

Academic Penalties: Teacher candidates may receive a failing grade on the assignment, assessment, or course where the violation occurred. This immediate consequence is meant to reflect the seriousness of academic misconduct.
Academic Probation: Candidates found guilty of academic dishonesty may be placed on academic probation, during which their academic progress is closely monitored. This serves as both a disciplinary measure and a warning for the candidate to improve their conduct.
Suspension or Dismissal: Severe or repeated violations of academic integrity may result in suspension or permanent dismissal from the program. TXITE reserves the right to dismiss any candidate who fails to uphold the institution’s ethical standards. In such cases, the violation will be noted on the candidate’s academic record.
Reporting to the Texas Education Agency (TEA): As part of the certification process, violations of the Code of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators may be reported to TEA. Such reports can have long-term effects on a candidate’s ability to obtain or maintain teacher certification within the state of Texas.

Proctoring Guidelines and Requirements

To ensure the fairness and integrity of the testing environment, teacher candidates must follow all proctoring guidelines. TXITE uses Proctorio as a remote proctoring service, which requires candidates to:

Use Approved Browsers: Candidates must use Google Chrome or Microsoft Edge with the Proctorio extension installed. No other browsers are permitted during assessments.
Access Through Populi: Candidates must log in to Populi using their secure credentials to access exams. Proctorio will only be activated during the exam session and will monitor for any potential violations of testing integrity, including unauthorized resource use, collaboration, or suspicious movements.
Technical Requirements: Candidates are responsible for ensuring they have a stable internet connection, a functioning webcam, and a microphone (if required) for the duration of the exam. Mobile devices such as smartphones or tablets are not permitted for proctored exams.

Preparing for Proctorio Exams

To help teacher candidates succeed, TXITE provides practice exams and preparatory resources to familiarize candidates with the Proctorio setup. Candidates should:

Install the Proctorio extension and test it before any official exam.
Find a quiet, private space to take the exam without interruptions.
Be prepared to participate in room scans, as required, to ensure no unauthorized materials or individuals are present during the exam session.

Candidates are also encouraged to access Proctorio’s live chat support for any technical difficulties encountered during the exam.

Upholding the Integrity of the Teaching Profession

The experience of being proctored during assessments is not only essential for maintaining academic integrity but also serves to prepare future teachers for the professional responsibilities they will encounter. Teachers are entrusted with assessing the knowledge and abilities of their students fairly and accurately. By adhering to the highest standards of honesty during their own assessments, teacher candidates learn to value and uphold these principles in their classrooms.

Proctoring also helps highlight the issue of equal access to resources in educational settings. By requiring reliable technology, such as stable internet connections and working equipment, teacher candidates gain awareness of the disparities that can exist in students' access to learning tools. As future educators, this understanding can help them work toward ensuring all students are equipped for success.

Consequences for Proctoring Violations

Proctoring violations are treated with the utmost seriousness at TXITE. The consequences for violations of proctoring guidelines include:

First Violation: Candidates will be placed on academic probation for the remainder of the program and required to attend an integrity counseling session. This session will review the violation, Proctorio’s monitoring alerts, and strategies for upholding integrity in future exams.
Second Violation: A second violation will result in immediate dismissal from the program. Candidates will be removed from the Educator Certification Online System (ECOS) and reported to TEA, which can impact future eligibility for certification and participation in other educator preparation programs in Texas.

Support for Academic Success and Integrity

TXITE is committed to providing its teacher candidates with the resources and support needed to succeed academically while maintaining integrity. These resources include workshops on proper citation methods, guidelines for avoiding plagiarism, and the use of plagiarism detection software. Teacher candidates are encouraged to seek guidance and clarification on academic matters to avoid unintentional breaches of integrity.

By fostering a supportive environment that emphasizes academic honesty, TXITE aims to cultivate a community of ethical, responsible educators who will carry these values into their future classrooms. Adhering to the principles of integrity and professionalism ensures that teacher candidates not only excel academically but also develop the character necessary to lead with honor in their teaching careers.

In summary, the TXITE Student Integrity and Academic Honesty Policy is designed to uphold the credibility and trustworthiness of our educational programs. Teacher candidates are expected to embody these principles throughout their time in the program, and by doing so, they prepare themselves to serve as ethical leaders and role models for their future students.

Any candidate in violation of the Code of Ethics and Standard Practices for Texas Educators are subject

to immediate program dismissal and reported to the Texas Education Agency.

AI Use Policy

Purpose
This policy is designed to guide teacher candidates at the Texas Institute for Teacher Education (TXITE) in the responsible and ethical use of artificial intelligence (AI). The goal is to ensure that AI technologies are used effectively in assignments and educational activities, particularly where AI is essential for training and enhancing teaching practices.

Responsible Use of AI in Assignments
Educational Enhancement: Candidates are encouraged to use AI tools to enrich their learning experiences. When incorporated into assignments, AI should serve as a tool to deepen understanding, inspire creativity, and cultivate innovative teaching practices. It should not be used to merely generate work for submission.

Ethical Considerations: The application of AI in assignments should align with TXITE’s values and ethical standards. Candidates must ensure that AI-generated content is used thoughtfully, with their work remaining original and reflective of their own comprehension.

Transparency: When AI is utilized in an assignment, candidates must clearly disclose the extent of its contribution. This includes identifying which elements were AI-assisted and which were completed independently.

Required Use of AI in Training
Skill Development: In specific courses, candidates will be required to use AI tools as part of their training to develop skills in enhancing teaching practices. These assignments are intended to familiarize candidates with AI technologies applicable in educational settings.

Guidance and Support: TXITE provides training and resources to help candidates effectively and ethically use AI in their assignments. Instructors will offer guidance on integrating AI tools into teaching practices, enabling candidates to confidently apply these skills in real-world scenarios.

Reflection and Application: Candidates are expected to reflect on their use of AI in assignments and consider how these tools can be applied in their future teaching careers. Assignments may require candidates to evaluate the effectiveness of AI in educational contexts and its impact on student learning.

Academic Integrity and AI
Originality and Authorship: While AI can be a valuable tool for generating ideas and supporting research, candidates must ensure that their work remains their own. Unacknowledged use of AI-generated content is a violation of TXITE’s academic integrity policy.

Proper Citation: If AI tools contribute to an assignment, candidates must provide appropriate citations, specifying the AI tool used and its role in creating the content.

Avoiding Misuse: AI should not be used to bypass the learning process or complete assignments without proper understanding. Instead, it should enhance critical thinking, problem-solving, and other essential academic skills.

Continuous Learning and Improvement
Ongoing Education: TXITE is committed to providing continuous education on the ethical and effective use of AI. Candidates are encouraged to stay informed about advancements in AI and its potential applications in education.

Feedback and Adaptation: Candidates are encouraged to provide feedback on their experiences using AI in assignments. This feedback will help TXITE refine its AI-related training to better meet the evolving needs of candidates.

Support Resources: TXITE offers resources, including workshops and tutorials, to help candidates master the use of AI tools in their academic work. Candidates are encouraged to take full advantage of these resources to enhance their learning.

Policy Enforcement
Violations of this AI Use Policy, including misuse of AI in assignments or failure to adhere to academic integrity standards, will be addressed according to TXITE’s disciplinary procedures. Candidates found in violation may face consequences, including loss of access to AI tools, academic penalties, or other disciplinary actions.

Policy Review and Updates
This policy will be reviewed regularly to reflect new developments in AI technology and education. Changes to the policy will be communicated to candidates, with all updates taking effect immediately upon approval.

Contact Information
For any questions or concerns regarding this AI Use Policy, candidates should contact their course instructor.

Using AI to Enhance Professional Development

Understanding Texas Teacher Standards
AI tools can be invaluable in helping candidates understand the Texas Teacher Standards, which are critical for both passing the TExES exams and excelling in the classroom. Here’s how AI can support this learning:

Personalized Learning Plans: AI platforms can analyze learning outcomes and progress, offering tailored study plans focused on areas that need improvement, particularly in mastering the Texas Teacher Standards.
Interactive Simulations: AI-driven simulations allow practice in applying the Texas Teacher Standards in real-world scenarios, providing instant feedback to refine understanding and approach.
AI-Generated Quizzes and Flashcards: Regular use of AI-generated quizzes and flashcards can reinforce knowledge of the standards, with adaptive difficulty levels ensuring continual challenge and improvement.

Preparing for the TExES Exams
The TExES exams are rigorous, and AI tools can be instrumental in preparation:

Practice Tests: AI can generate practice tests that mimic the format and difficulty of the TExES exams, helping identify weak areas and focus studies accordingly.
Content Review: AI-powered summaries can condense key concepts from textbooks and study guides, making the review process more efficient.
Targeted Feedback: AI systems can provide detailed feedback on practice test performance, pinpointing specific standards or competencies that require further review.
Time Management: AI tools can track progress and suggest study schedules to ensure all necessary content is covered before the exam, including timed practice exams to help manage time effectively during the actual test.

Preparing for the First Day of Teaching
Transitioning from student to teacher can be challenging, but AI can assist in making the first day and subsequent teaching days successful:

Lesson Planning: AI can suggest lesson plans aligned with the Texas Teacher Standards, tailored to specific subject areas and grade levels, and customizable based on student needs.
Classroom Management: AI-driven simulations offer practice in managing classroom behavior through various scenarios, helping develop effective strategies for maintaining a positive learning environment.
Student Engagement Strategies: AI can recommend engagement strategies based on current educational research, suggesting interactive activities, differentiated instruction techniques, or technology integration ideas that resonate with diverse student populations.
Assessment Tools: AI can assist in creating formative and summative assessments aligned with the Texas Teacher Standards, helping evaluate student learning effectively from day one.
Reflective Practice: AI can aid in reflective practice by analyzing lesson data (e.g., student performance, engagement levels) and providing insights on what worked well and what could be improved, invaluable as teaching practice is refined.

Integrating AI in Continuous Professional Development

Stay Updated on Standards: AI tools can help stay informed about updates to Texas Teacher Standards and best practices in education, ensuring teaching methods remain current and effective.

SATISFACTORY ACADEMIC PROGRESS

The Texas Institute for Teacher Education (TXITE) implements a robust Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) policy to ensure that all teacher candidates remain on track to complete their certification program within the required timeframe. This policy defines the standards that candidates must meet in order to progress through their program, addressing both qualitative and quantitative measures of progress. TXITE takes appropriate actions, such as placing candidates on academic probation or dismissing them from the program if these standards are not met, while also offering support and remediation when necessary.

1. Enrollment and Program Completion Timeline
Teacher candidates at TXITE can enroll at any time during the year, which allows for flexible entry points into the program. Once enrolled, candidates are expected to complete the program within a maximum of two calendar years. This timeline includes:
• Completing all 12 academic modules that cover critical areas of teaching aligned with the Texas Teacher Standards and INTASC Standards.

• Completing one module every month.
• Serving as an intern/probationary teacher for one full school year, which provides practical, hands-on experience in a Texas public school classroom.
Candidates who complete the program within this timeline will be eligible to earn the Texas Standard Teacher Certificate. Failure to complete the program within the two-year period results in program termination, and candidates must apply for re-enrollment if they wish to continue their studies.

2. Qualitative and Quantitative Standards
TXITE’s SAP policy ensures that candidates meet both qualitative and quantitative standards throughout their program.
Qualitative Standards
• Minimum Grade Requirement: Candidates must achieve a minimum grade of 70% (C-) in each module. This standard is critical to demonstrate competency in essential teaching skills, such as instructional planning, student engagement, and classroom management.
Each module is assessed through various assignments, exams, and performance evaluations that reflect the Texas Teacher Standards. Candidates who do not meet this minimum standard in any module are placed on academic probation and required to complete a remediation plan to improve their performance.
Quantitative Standards
• Completion of Coursework: Teacher candidates must complete 100% of the required coursework for each module, including assignments, exams, and participation activities.
• Weekly Course Interaction: Candidates must engage actively in course activities each week. This includes:
o Participating in online discussions and forums.
o Attending live or recorded webinars and lectures.
o Submitting weekly assignments, quizzes, or reflections.
o Interacting directly with course instructors through office hours, emails, or other communication tools.
Candidates are required to interact with their instructors at least once per week, either through participating in instructor-led activities or interacting with the course content. Failure to meet these weekly interaction requirements may result in academic warnings or probation.

3. Gate-Based Structure
TXITE uses a gate-based structure to monitor and evaluate candidates' progress through the program. Each gate represents a set of modules and associated requirements that must be completed before advancing to the next stage of the program.
Gate 1: Modules 1-7
• Modules cover essential teacher standards, such as Instructional Planning and Delivery, Content Knowledge, and Learning Environments.
• Candidates must complete all assignments, assessments, and participation requirements for each module with a minimum grade of 70%.
• Upon successful completion of Gate 1, candidates advance to Gate 2, which focuses on preparing for the TExES exams.
Gate 2: Module 8 (TExES Exam Preparation)
• This gate is designed to prepare candidates for the TExES exams, which are required for teacher certification.
• Candidates engage in comprehensive practice exams, study sessions, and content reviews to demonstrate readiness for the exams.
• Candidates must submit a Statement of Eligibility (SOE) to register for the TExES exams.
• Successful completion of this gate allows candidates to advance to Gate 3.
Gate 3: Pre-Teaching Field Observations (Module 9)
• Candidates must complete a series of pre-teaching field observations in a Texas public school.
• Observations include writing reports, maintaining reflective journals, and receiving mentor feedback.
• Completion of these field observation requirements is necessary for progression to Gate 4, which involves the professional internship.
Gate 4: Professional Internship and Certification (Modules 10-12)
• Candidates complete a full school year as an intern/probationary teacher, which includes ongoing evaluations by mentor teachers and school administrators.
• Candidates must submit a reflective teaching portfolio and other required documentation, including lesson plans.
• The final component of this gate is the Certification Defense and Review, where candidates demonstrate their readiness for certification through a structured defense process.
• Upon successful completion, candidates are eligible to apply for the Texas Standard Teacher Certificate.

4. Monitoring Academic Progress
TXITE closely monitors each candidate's academic progress through both qualitative and quantitative measures. Progress is tracked through the institution’s Populi Learning Management System (LMS), which records grades, completion of assignments, and weekly participation.
• Faculty Feedback: Candidates receive ongoing feedback from faculty on their assignments and assessments. This feedback is aligned with the grading rubrics, ensuring transparency and consistency in the evaluation process.
• Progress Reports: At regular intervals, candidates are provided with formal progress reports that outline their academic standing and progress toward meeting the program’s benchmarks. These reports help candidates stay on track and provide opportunities for early intervention if challenges arise.

5. Academic Probation and Termination
If a candidate fails to meet the minimum academic standards, they will be placed on academic probation. During this probationary period, the candidate must:
• Develop a remediation plan with their academic advisor, which includes strategies for improving their performance and addressing any deficiencies.
• Complete the remediation plan within the specified timeline in order to remain in the program.
Failure to meet the requirements of the remediation plan or continued failure to meet academic standards will result in program termination. Candidates who fail to complete the entire program, including the internship, within the two-year timeframe will also be terminated from the program.

6. Appeals Process
Candidates who are placed on academic probation or terminated from the program have the right to appeal the decision. The appeals process is as follows:
• Appeals Submission: Candidates must submit a written appeal within 10 days of receiving the notice of probation or termination. The appeal must outline the circumstances that contributed to the candidate’s unsatisfactory progress and present a clear plan for future success in the program.
• Review Process: The appeal will be reviewed by the Program Director and the candidate’s advisor. The review process includes an evaluation of the candidate’s academic history, participation records, and any extenuating circumstances presented in the appeal.
• Decision: A decision will be provided to the candidate within 15 days of the submission of the appeal. The decision is final and binding.

7. Certification Eligibility

Upon successful completion of all modules and the full school year of internship, candidates are eligible to apply for the Texas Standard Teacher Certificate. To qualify for certification, candidates must meet all SAP requirements, including maintaining the required minimum grade in each module, completing all field observations and internship requirements, and passing the TExES exams. All program requirements must be completed within the two-year timeframe.

WITHDRAWAL POLICY: Candidates may withdraw and receive a grade of "W" for a course by giving written notification to the Program Director (drvillanueva@txite.today) before the last course day.

PROGRAM LENGTH: The length of the program is based upon individual candidate needs. Candidates have two calendar years to complete the program and earn the Texas Standard Teacher Certificate.

8. Grading

The grading approach at The Texas Institute for Teacher Education (TXITE) follows a comprehensive and transparent system that ensures fairness and precision in evaluating teacher candidates' performance. The grade scale and grading policies are located within the course syllabus. The grading system is based on a detailed letter grade scale and a weighted distribution of course assignments, each contributing to the final course grade based on specific percentages.

Letter Grade Scale

Grades are assigned based on the following scale, which translates performance into both grade points and a pass/fail status:

A (90.00 or higher) – 4.00 grade points – Pass
B (80.00 – 89.99) – 3.00 grade points – Pass
C (70.00 – 79.99) – 2.00 grade points – Pass
D (60.00 – 69.99) – 1.00 grade points – Fail
F (below 60.00) – 0.00 grade points – Fail
W – Withdrawn – Not factored into GPA, but counts against Course Completion Rate as attempted credits
AW – Administrative Withdrawal – Not factored into GPA, but counts against Course Completion Rate as attempted credits

Grades are calculated to the second decimal place, and no rounding is applied to ensure accuracy. For example, a grade of 89.99% will result in a B, not an A.

Course Assignment Groups and Weight Distribution

The final grade in each course is calculated as a weighted average of various assignments and assessments. The following categories and their corresponding weights contribute to the total course grade:

Candidate Field Observations – 5% (11 evaluations, rubric-based)
Course Engagement/Open Discussions – 2% (20 graded tasks)
Critical Learning Reflections – 2% (4 rubric-based assignments)
Field Supervisor Classroom Observations/Evaluations – 20% (19 rubric-based evaluations)
Final Exams – 2% (7 computer-scored exams)
Interactive TExES Score Reports – 2% (8 credit-based tasks)
Learning Tasks – 2% (25 graded tasks)
Mentor/Principal Progress Reports – 20% (8 rubric-based evaluations)
Mock Exams – 2% (14 computer-scored exams)
Performance-Based Assessments – 20% (18 rubric-based evaluations)
Pre-internship Knowledge and Skill Preparation – 2% (8 rubric-based tasks)
Professional Reflections – 2% (7 rubric-based assignments)
Qualifying Exams – 2% (14 computer-scored exams)
Remediation Exams – 2% (13 computer-scored exams)
TEA Certification – 5% (2 credit-based assignments)
Teacher Lesson Plans – 5% (7 rubric-based evaluations)
TExES Exams – 5% (2 computer-scored exams)

In total, there are 187 graded tasks that contribute to the final course grade, ensuring that students are evaluated comprehensively across various areas of learning and performance.

Additional Grade Types

W (Withdrawn): This grade is assigned when a student withdraws from a course before the withdrawal deadline. While it does not impact the student’s GPA, it counts against their Course Completion Rate as an attempted credit.
AW (Administrative Withdrawal): This grade is given when a student fails to meet academic participation requirements. Like the "W" grade, it does not affect the GPA but does count against the Course Completion Rate as an attempted credit.

Summary of Grading Policy

TXITE’s grading system is designed to provide clear benchmarks for student performance, align evaluations with Texas Teacher Standards, and ensure that candidates are held to rigorous standards that reflect their readiness for professional teaching. Through a combination of rubric-based assessments, computer-scored exams, and professional evaluations, candidates are graded on a wide range of competencies, from practical teaching skills to critical reflections and standardized testing readiness. The clear delineation of grade weights and scales ensures transparency, enabling candidates to understand how their performance contributes to their final grade.

CANCELLATION AND WITHDRAWAL POLICY

At The Texas Institute for Teacher Education (TXITE), we are committed to maintaining and applying fair and equitable policies regarding the cancellation and withdrawal of students. These policies are designed to meet or exceed the requirements of state and federal regulators and any other industry regulators that may have jurisdiction over our programs. Our goal is to ensure that students fully understand their rights and obligations concerning withdrawal or cancellation from the program and that these processes are transparent, reasonable, and compliant with all applicable laws.

Student-Initiated Cancellation or Withdrawal
1. Notification of Cancellation or Withdrawal: Students may notify the institution of their intent to cancel their enrollment or withdraw from the program by:
• Email communication to the Program Director (drvillanueva@txite.today).
• Submission of a formal withdrawal form through the Populi Student Information System (SIS).
• Written notice sent via U.S. Mail to the institution’s official address.
Students are encouraged to contact their academic advisor or the admissions office to discuss their decision before proceeding with a formal withdrawal to ensure they are fully informed of any academic or financial implications.
2. Effective Date of Cancellation or Withdrawal: The effective date of cancellation or withdrawal is the date the institution receives the written notice from the student. The student’s enrollment and access to academic resources will be terminated as of that date unless otherwise specified in the notification.
3. Refund Policy: Refunds for tuition, fees, or other program-related costs will be processed in accordance with TXITE’s Refund Policy. Students are advised to review the policy to understand the specific terms regarding refunds based on the timing of the withdrawal or cancellation.

Administrative Withdrawal or Cancellation
1. Administrative Withdrawal by the Institution: TXITE reserves the right to administratively withdraw or cancel the enrollment of a student for the following reasons:
o Failure to meet academic progress requirements or to comply with the institution’s satisfactory academic progress (SAP) policy.
o Non-payment or failure to comply with established payment plans.
o Violations of the Code of Ethics or student conduct policies, including academic dishonesty or inappropriate behavior that disrupts the educational process.
o Failure to complete or provide required documentation, such as identity verification or transcripts, within specified timeframes.
o Any other behavior or circumstance deemed by the institution to jeopardize the academic integrity or operational function of the program.
2. Notification of Administrative Withdrawal or Cancellation: The student will be notified in writing of the institution’s decision to withdraw them from the program. This notification will include:
o The reason(s) for the withdrawal or cancellation.
o The effective date of the action.
o Any potential financial or academic consequences of the withdrawal.
The student may appeal the decision by submitting a written appeal to the Program Director within ten business days of receiving the notice. Appeals will be reviewed in accordance with TXITE’s grievance and appeals process.
3. Readmission After Withdrawal: A student who has been withdrawn, either voluntarily or administratively, may apply for readmission to the program. The readmission process will require the student to meet current admissions requirements and provide a clear plan for addressing any issues that led to the previous withdrawal or cancellation.

Access to Policies
1. Publication of Policies: The institution’s cancellation and withdrawal policies, including any related administrative actions, are published on the TXITE website and are readily accessible to all students. These policies are also included in the course syllabus and the student handbook, which are distributed at the beginning of each academic year or upon enrollment.
2. Student Review of Policies: Students are encouraged to review the cancellation and withdrawal policies thoroughly before enrollment. Questions regarding these policies can be directed to the admissions office or academic advising team for clarification.

Compliance with State, Federal, and DEAC Requirements
TXITE ensures that its cancellation and withdrawal policies comply with all applicable state and federal regulations, including those governing student refunds, tuition protection, and consumer rights. The institution also regularly reviews program policies to ensure ongoing compliance with all regulatory requirements.

IMMEDIATE PROGRAM DISMISSAL POLICY

Purpose:
The Immediate Program Dismissal Policy ensures that all members of the Texas Institute for Teacher Education (TXITE) community maintain a high standard of personal and professional conduct, reflecting the program’s commitment to faith-centered education, interfaith cooperation, and respect for diversity. This policy provides clear guidelines on expectations, the consequences of non-compliance, and the procedures for enforcing these standards.

Policy Statement:
TXITE is committed to providing an inclusive, safe, and welcoming environment that honors the personal worth, dignity, and rights of all individuals. Guided by principles of faith and respect, TXITE expects all teacher candidates to exhibit behaviors that support these values. Any breach of these expectations may result in immediate program dismissal without the possibility of appeal.

Expectations of Teacher Candidates:
All TXITE teacher candidates are expected to:

Demonstrate respect for the personal worth, dignity, and rights of others.
Show respect for the diverse backgrounds, personalities, convictions, and faith traditions of candidates, staff, and faculty.
Exhibit a commitment to academic, spiritual, and moral enlightenment.
Maintain respectful behavior toward all staff, faculty, and students.
Uphold academic honesty, including satisfactory academic progress.
Demonstrate financial integrity by meeting all financial obligations in a timely manner.

Violations Leading to Immediate Dismissal:
A teacher candidate may be dismissed from TXITE without the possibility of appeal if they engage in any of the following violations:

Harassment, discrimination, or disrespect towards any individual or group based on personal characteristics or beliefs.
Persistent failure to respect the diversity of backgrounds and beliefs represented within the TXITE community.
Any form of academic dishonesty, including plagiarism or cheating.
Disruptive or disrespectful behavior toward staff, faculty, or other candidates.
Repeated failure to make satisfactory academic progress despite advisement and support.
Failure to meet financial obligations to the program after repeated warnings.

Procedures for Enforcement:

Orientation and Acknowledgment:
At the start of the program, all teacher candidates will review this policy and sign an acknowledgment form, indicating that they understand and agree to the standards and consequences outlined.
Incident Reporting and Documentation:
Faculty, field supervisors, or staff who observe or are informed of any behavior that violates this policy are required to document the incident in writing. Documentation should include a description of the incident, dates, names of involved parties, and any relevant supporting evidence.
Teacher candidates may also report incidents that they believe violate this policy directly to the Program Director for investigation. Reports will be handled confidentially and promptly, ensuring a fair and thorough review.
Three-Tier Warning System for Minor Incidents:
For lesser infractions that do not warrant immediate dismissal, TXITE will apply a three-tier warning system:
- Verbal Warning: A verbal warning is issued, explaining the observed behavior and offering guidance on corrective action.
- Written Warning: If the behavior persists, a written warning will be issued, summarizing the initial warning and further specifying required changes.
- Final Warning: A third infraction will result in a final warning, explaining that further issues may lead to immediate dismissal.
Each warning will be documented and placed in the candidate’s file, with an opportunity for the candidate to respond in writing.
Immediate Dismissal Process:
In cases of severe violations (such as harassment, academic dishonesty, or failure to meet financial obligations after warnings), the Program Director or an authorized representative will initiate the immediate dismissal process.
- The candidate will be notified in writing of the dismissal, citing specific policy violations and the evidence supporting the decision.
- The decision is final and non-appealable.
Review and Oversight by the Program Director:
The Program Director, in collaboration with administrative leadership and selected faculty members, will review all immediate dismissal cases. This team ensures that dismissal decisions are consistent with TXITE’s mission and policies, upholding fairness and respect for all parties involved.

Policy Updates and Review:
This policy will be reviewed annually to ensure alignment with TXITE’s values, mission, and regulatory requirements. Updates will reflect feedback from staff, faculty, and the broader TXITE community.

Acknowledgment of Understanding:
Teacher candidates are required to sign this policy during orientation, acknowledging their understanding of and commitment to upholding TXITE’s standards. This acknowledgment is retained in each candidate’s file.

This Immediate Program Dismissal Policy underscores TXITE’s dedication to fostering a faith-driven, respectful, and ethical educational environment. By adhering to these standards, teacher candidates contribute positively to the TXITE community and their future classrooms.

Program Policy: About